The Hiring Intelligence Platform for independent recruiters

Turn interviews into hiring decisions employers trust.

RecruiterLens helps independent recruiters organize interview evidence, identify what still needs to be validated, compare candidates consistently, and deliver employer-ready hiring recommendations with confidence.

Hiring Recommendation · Jordan Lee — Senior Sales Representative
Draft ready for review
Relevant experience20%
Strong evidence
Problem-solving15%
Meets expectations
Accountability10%
Limited evidence
Missing evidence — Team leadership

Jordan described leading a team but did not specify team size or measurable outcomes.

Suggested follow-up: "How many people were on the team, which decisions did you personally own, and how was the outcome measured?"

Decision Confidence
68%
Needs validation
  • · Leadership not validated
  • · Reference checks pending
  • · Conflict management not discussed
Structured
Consistent interview criteria across every candidate
Evidence-based
Recommendations tied to specific interview answers
Missing evidence
Surfaced before you send a recommendation
Employer-ready
Branded, printable reports built from your notes
Human approved
You review and confirm every recommendation

The problem

A transcript tells you what was said. It doesn't tell you what is still missing.

Independent recruiters juggle multiple clients, roles, and candidates — often relying on spreadsheets, documents, and memory. RecruiterLens brings structure to interview evidence so your recommendations are fair, consistent, and easy to explain.

Interview notes are inconsistent between candidates.

Important answers are forgotten after several interviews.

Résumés emphasize credentials but not how a person thinks or works.

Employers want clear explanations, not long transcripts.

Strong candidates get overlooked when they're quieter.

Confident candidates can appear stronger without real evidence.

How it works

Four steps from interview to recommendation.

01

Define the role

Create the employer profile, upload the job description, and approve a suggested evaluation scorecard with weighted competencies.

02

Interview consistently

Structured interview guides with competency-tagged questions, evidence indicators, and consistency across candidates.

03

Review evidence & gaps

RecruiterLens organizes interview responses into evidence, flags missing information, and suggests strong follow-up questions.

04

Deliver a recommendation

You approve every conclusion. Generate a branded, employer-ready report with clear reasoning — never an automated decision.

Candidate Intelligence

Compare candidates by evidence — not by raw scores.

Every recommendation is built from the criteria you approved. Select a candidate to see strengths, missing information, validation still required, and the follow-up questions that would close each gap.

  • Evidence collected per competency
  • Missing information and validation required
  • Suggested follow-up questions with rationale
  • Recruiter and employer notes side by side
  • Recommendation with cited supporting answers
Competency
Jordan L.
Maria C.
Priya S.
Relevant experience
Strong
Meets
Strong
Role-specific knowledge
Strong
Exceptional
Limited
Problem-solving
Meets
Strong
Meets
Communication
Strong
Meets
Needs validation
Motivation for the role
Meets
Strong
Strong
Priya has 3 items requiring validation — recommend a 15-minute follow-up before final ranking.

Signature capability

The best hiring decisions come from identifying what you still don't know.

After every interview, RecruiterLens shows exactly what remains unvalidated before you make a recommendation — based on weak evidence, contradictions, unclear timelines, and high-weight scorecard categories.

Evidence collected

Answers organized against every approved competency.

Evidence missing

Gaps flagged with the interview excerpt that revealed them.

Suggested follow-up

Targeted questions that would close each specific gap.

Why it matters

Rationale linking the follow-up to a high-weight criterion.

Candidate answered — 12:47

"I led a team through a difficult project last year and we delivered it on time."

Evidence missing · Team leadership (weight 15%)

Team size, the candidate's specific responsibilities, and the measurable outcome were not described.

Suggested follow-up: Tell me how many people were on the team, what decisions you personally owned, and how the outcome was measured.

Why it matters — Team leadership is a top-weighted competency for this role and appears once in the transcript without a measurable outcome.

Evidence collected · Customer communication

Two detailed examples of resolving escalated customer complaints, each with a measurable outcome and cited timestamp.

Decision Confidence

Two scores — because recommending a candidate is not the same as knowing enough about them.

The candidate evaluation summarizes evidence against the approved scorecard. Decision Confidence tells you how sure the recommendation itself is — and exactly what would raise it.

Decision Confidence measures confidence in the recommendation. It does not measure confidence in the candidate.

Candidate Evaluation
91/ 100
Strong evidence
Decision Confidence
68%
Validation required
To raise confidence
  • Leadership not validated in prior role
  • Reference checks pending
  • Technical depth partially covered
  • Conflict management not yet discussed

Hiring Intelligence

Every interview builds your private recruiting knowledge base.

RecruiterLens turns each completed interview into structured, searchable insight — so you can see which questions produce the strongest evidence, which competencies matter most for your placements, and which parts of your process are quietly wasting time.

Search your recruiting knowledge
Which questions consistently uncover top sales performers?
Which competencies appear most in successful warehouse placements?
Which follow-up questions produce the strongest evidence?
Which interview questions rarely generate useful evidence?
What answers do my best hires consistently give?

A searchable recruiter knowledge system — not a prediction engine. RecruiterLens surfaces patterns from your own interviews and leaves the interpretation to you.

Question performance

See which questions produced the most Strong-evidence answers across your last 90 days of interviews.

Competency signal

Rank the competencies that most consistently distinguished shortlisted candidates from passed ones.

Underperforming questions

Identify questions that rarely surface useful evidence — and get suggestions for stronger replacements.

Candidate Evidence Profile

An evidence profile — not a personality profile.

RecruiterLens never guesses personality. No DISC, no Myers-Briggs, no emotion analysis, no appearance scoring. Every conclusion is tied to specific interview evidence the recruiter can review and challenge.

  • Tied to cited interview answers
  • Editable by the recruiter
  • Never used to auto-reject a candidate
Jordan Lee
Senior Sales Representative · Northstar Logistics
Draft profile
OwnershipStrong Evidence
Learning agilityStrong Evidence
Problem-solvingModerate Evidence
LeadershipLimited Evidence
Customer communicationStrong Evidence
Decision-makingNeeds validation

Recruiter Workspace

A workspace that tells you what to do next — not another ATS.

Clients, roles, candidates, interviews, recommendations, reports, tasks and calendar in one lightweight surface. Every card is actionable and every follow-up ties back to real evidence.

  • Multiple employer client profiles
  • Role-specific evaluation frameworks
  • Consent-first interview capture
  • Branded PDF reports with expiring links
  • Recommendation approval workflow
  • Lightweight — not a full ATS
Today's priorities
Wednesday
Review Jordan Lee's draft recommendation
Northstar Logistics · Sales Rep
Ask Maria Chen 3 follow-up questions
Halden Group · Project Manager
Send final shortlist report to Cove Retail
3 candidates · Store Manager
Confirm consent before tomorrow's interview
10:00 · Priya S.
Reference call with Alex Rowe
Thursday · 15:30
Recruiter review — Jordan Lee
  • Employment timeline has a 7-month unexplained gap
  • Résumé claim contradicts interview answer at 14:22
  • Leadership claims need validation with a reference
  • Salary expectations changed between screening and follow-up

Surfaced for your review — never used to auto-reject a candidate.

Employer Reports

The recommendation your client remembers you for.

RecruiterLens produces employer-ready reports that read the way senior clients expect — clear summary, cited evidence, honest gaps, and a specific recommendation you approve before sending.

  • Branded PDF exports
  • Secure, expiring share links
  • Never sent without recruiter approval
Report · Northstar LogisticsPDF · 8 pages
Recommendation
Jordan Lee — Recommended with follow-up validation

Strong evidence in relevant experience, customer communication, and ownership. Team leadership requires validation before final offer — reference call scheduled.

Executive summary
Evidence summary
Competency review
Missing evidence
Recruiter notes
Recommendation
Suggested next steps

Role customization

Every role gets its own evaluation framework.

Upload a job description, generate a scorecard, customize competencies, adjust weights, approve and lock. RecruiterLens tracks every change so your evaluation criteria are defensible on every placement.

Upload job description
Generate scorecard
Customize competencies
Adjust weights
Approve scorecard
Lock scorecard
Track every change
Reuse across candidates
Starter role templates
Sales representativeCustomer-service representativeExecutive assistantSoftware developerProject managerBookkeeperWarehouse associateSkilled-trades workerProperty managerService advisorMarketing coordinatorCleaning supervisor

Templates are starting points — you review and approve every scorecard before evaluation begins.

Integrations

Works with your existing hiring workflow.

RecruiterLens fits alongside the tools recruiters already run their business on. The integrations below are on our public roadmap.

Coming soon
Sourcing
  • · Indeed
  • · LinkedIn
Coming soon
ATS
  • · Greenhouse
  • · Lever
  • · Ashby
  • · Workable
Coming soon
Calendar & meetings
  • · Google Calendar
  • · Microsoft Outlook
  • · Zoom
  • · Google Meet
  • · Microsoft Teams
Coming soon
Email
  • · Gmail
  • · Microsoft 365

Integrations shown are planned. RecruiterLens works standalone today; no external connection is required to start.

Fairness & human review

Built to support professional judgment — not replace it.

RecruiterLens is designed to make evaluations more structured and explainable. Human oversight remains essential — we don't claim the system is bias-free, and we don't score anything that isn't job-related evidence.

Human approval on every recommendation

Drafts are labelled clearly. Recruiters confirm or modify before anything is shared.

Evidence-based conclusions only

Conclusions are tied to interview answers, résumé content, and approved criteria — nothing else.

No appearance, emotion, or personality guessing

No facial or voice inference, no scoring of confidence, accent, or appearance.

Privacy and consent by design

Explicit consent capture, encryption in transit and at rest, configurable retention, and full audit logs.

Pricing

Transparent plans. 14-day free trial. No annual commitment.

Solo
$39/ month

For independent recruiters beginning structured evaluations.

  • One recruiter account
  • Up to 5 active job openings
  • Structured interviews & guides
  • Evidence-based recommendations
  • Branded PDF reports
Start free trial
Recommended
Professional
$79/ month

The recommended plan for busy independent recruiters.

  • Unlimited employer clients
  • More active roles & higher usage
  • Candidate Intelligence workspace
  • Decision Confidence & missing-evidence review
  • Hiring Intelligence knowledge base
  • Branded reports & custom scorecards
Start free trial
Agency
$199/ month

For small recruiting teams working across shared clients.

  • Multiple recruiter accounts
  • Shared clients & roles
  • Team permissions & analytics
  • Centralized templates
  • Audit logs & priority support
Talk to us

Every hiring recommendation, backed by evidence.

Start free for 14 days. No credit card required to run your first structured evaluation.